Insight
New Guidelines for Diagnosing and Quantifying Noise Induced Hearing Loss
When considering whether to take on Noise Induced Hearing Loss claim, we have to weigh up the prospects.
After establishing that a claim can be brought in time, we take into consideration the following;
· What a person has done for a living (i.e. whether they have worked in a known noisy industry)
· How long they were in that industry; and
· When they worked in that industry.
Once we are satisfied that a person could have been exposed to a substantial amount of noise over their career, we then send them for a hearing test. We have ways of reviewing the results, and we look for specific patterns which show whether a person is suffering with age-associated hearing loss, noise induced hearing loss or something else. To do this, legal practitioners have predominantly used the Coles, Lutman and Buffin 2000 guidelines (CLB guidelines).
However, earlier this year, Professor Brian C. J. Moore, Mr. David A Lowe (ENT Surgeon), and Mr. Graham Cox (ENT Surgeon) have teamed up and produced new guidelines (the MLC Guidelines 2022) for diagnosing and quantifying noise-induced hearing loss. The guidelines suggest substantial amendments to the existing guidance.
In brief … for people considering bringing a claim, it will now be easier to succeed!
A LOWER THRESHOLD OF EXPOSURE NEEDED TO CAUSE NIHL
Previously, a claimant had to prove that they had lifetime noise exposure level of at least 100dB. To reach this, a person would have to have worked in noise levels of 90dB for around 10 years. Now, for example, a person would only have to work in noise levels of 90dB for 1 year!
THERE IS NOW NO ‘LOWER LIMIT’ OF NOISE WHICH COULD AFFECT YOUR HEARING
Previously, anything under 85dB Lep,d was disregarded, as it was seen to be too low to cause any noise damage. The new guidelines recommend removing the lower action level, thus leaving all noise exposure as having the potential to contribute to a person’s hearing loss.
There are many other recommendations in the guidelines which affect the way legal practitioners handle claims, for example, how losses are calculated; which frequencies noise can affect; a distinction in the types of noise damage, for example military noise exposure etc. But all in all, the new guidelines will be welcome to claimant solicitors and will prove useful in existing and future claims.
If you feel like you are suffering with hearing loss, and you have worked in excessive noise in the past, please get in touch for a free telephone consultation / advice. All claims taken on are handled on a ‘no win no fee’ agreement.
Insights
More case results
- Compensation of £62,000 recovered for the tragic death of an unborn babyKate Rushton, Associate Solicitor in the clinical negligence department at Curtis Law Solicitors has recently settled a tragic case involving the still birth of Miss P’s first child at 31 weeks of pre...Read more
- Compensation of £175,000 recovered due a historical failure to correctly fix and plate a distal radius fractureKate Rushton, Associate Solicitor in the Clinical Negligence Department at Curtis Law Solicitors has recently settled a case for a client who sustained a fracture of his distal radius in his youth. T...Read more
- Compensation of £110,000 for avoidable loss of kidney and post-operative hernia following surgical errorThe specialist clinical negligence team at Curtis Law Solicitors has recovered £110,000 in compensation for a client who experienced loss of kidney and post-operative hernia following a surgical error...Read more
- Compensation of £46,000 for avoidable stillbirth following multiple breaches of duty of careThe specialist clinical negligence team at Curtis Law Solicitors has recovered £46,000 in compensation for a client who experienced an avoidable stillbirth following multiple breaches of duty of care....Read more
Free initial advice
Talk to our team
- Free, no-obligation initial advice
- Speak directly to a specialist solicitor
- Offices in Blackburn, Great Harwood and Manchester
Time limits apply to many claims, so seek advice early.
98%
of our clients would recommend us
“Very good, no pressure to commit to a claim, no harassment phone calls, very impressed with the professionalism.”


